This is often alleged to be the "head to" powder-or darn close to it- for just about any bottle-necked cartridge just one could handload. It's the foundation for so many pet loads, yet I haven't been happy with the results.
H4831 will do the job from the Swift although not authentic properly. You are going to by no means receive the pressures you require for regularity Along with the .223. 760, or H414 are going to be much better but for many rationale I ain't the largest fan of most ball powders.
4gr of H4831sc and Federal 215 primers. I discovered this combo produces .5MOA groups with velocity about 3020fps out of a 26" barrel. I use this similar powder in my 300wm shooting 180gr supplements, so It really is pleasant to possess just one powder for both of those.
Sweet!! I will select some up and provides it a check out. Thanks fellas, I value it! I'll Permit you to know what I discover. I do have a couple of 50 percent pound of 4350 I'm able to test that to start with and see what takes place.
IMR powders also preform well for me with one particular noteworthy exception. All the chrongraphing I've performed with them signifies the velecity is consistant earlier mentioned 32 degrees but begins to change once the temp starts to fall. The closer to zero I get the more they differ. I've witnessed up to 250 fps in a ten shot string with my h4831 vs h4831sc 243 and 223 in the winter time around right here. Have not observed this with a few of the other powders.
It can be likely that no more discussion is necessary, where circumstance we suggest starting a fresh thread. If however you're feeling your reaction is needed you can even now do so.
Everyone loading 7mm Rem Mag with H4831sc? How are the effects, any data it is possible to share? Also needs to mention I have some ELD-X 175's I would want to examination out, For those who have info on that in h4831 vs h4831sc addition.
Although this is most likely accurate, there is a whole lot additional to it than just not blowing oneself up. He couldn't hit prairie canine past about 150 yards, so I am guessing that inconsistent combustion wasn't undertaking anything favorable for h4831sc his grouping capacity with Those people loads.
The primary reason I switched from IMR 4831 to H4831 was to make use of the temperature insensitivity of the Hodgdon Intense powder.
locutus said: I nevertheless have a great stockpile of H450, the ball powder equal of 4831, which flows by my powder actions smoothly.
As for the 4831 vs 4831SC, These are precisely the same/identical powder cept for grain sizing. Load data is interchangeable.
I use 52 grs H4831sc that has a 117gr Hornady BTSP. It's correct, delicate mannered, and knocks whitetails down DRT. If it absolutely was me, I'd personally begin at 52 gr and operate up.
arkansas or ohio i under no circumstances found a change apart from the regular is like rolling cordwood onto the the pan.
IMR4831 and H4831SC are distinctive. Wherever you will be baffling it and thinking that it's close is H4831 and H4831SC are extremely similar. Those people two are essentially the exact same besides H4831SC is produced to smaller grains so it meters a lot easier.