Speak to your point out and local legislation for that age constraints and legality of ordering and possessing these solutions. For basic safety factors, we do not accept returns on powder. Due to Specific shipping and delivery needs for these merchandise, an additional $twenty five.fifty Hazardous Content charge will likely be used for just about any order containing flammable materials. Contiguous forty eight states only. For US sale only.
H4831 will get the job done within the Swift but not true nicely. You can expect to in no way receive the pressures you require for regularity Along with the .223. 760, or H414 is going to be far better but for many motive I ain't the greatest supporter of most ball powders.
What is actually the real difference? Compression. Without the extreme/major compression connected to the long grain 7828, the tension curve was altered as well as load fell apart.
Which means the knowledgable handloader can, with a few extrapolation, find a starting off load when only one is mentioned for a specific cartridge.
My experience would be that the SC and SSC loaded to the exact same fat as the extensive Lower shows a reduced velocity.
I've used H4831 and H4831SC in my 260 Rem with no big difference. The only thing would be the small Slash gives you a little more Room. Fantastic luck!gun)
Hodgdon H4831SC (Small Minimize) extruded rifle propellant is usually a leading choice for major game hunters who use handloader rifles. Introduced inside the nineteen fifties, this propellant has long been improved with shorter grain sizes which permits much better powder movement plus much more uniformity.
excaliber mentioned: I've uncovered the precise reverse for being true in my gun. H4831SC was the slowest powder with one hundred eighty g Accubonds. RL22 was a h4831sc load data much faster and equally correct powder in my three hundred Get Mag.
Presently making use of IMR 4831 inside a 300WSM, and see the H4831sc is a well-liked option for this caliber and yields a little more velocity. Aside from it being short Minimize, what's the primary difference in these two powders, and may I swap to H4831sc?
You might have for making a few much more posts for getting cleared to do PM's. As you reach that status I would publish from the categorised reloading section to check out if any one is near you for the trade. Click on to broaden...
As for your 4831 vs 4831SC, They're a similar/similar powder cept for grain measurement. Load data is interchangeable.
The "SC" stands for Small Minimize. I have not seen a distinction between either powder dut I don't think I would combine them.
arkansas or ohio i never ever found a big difference in addition to the standard is like rolling cordwood onto the the pan.
I sawed one particular in half to view how thick the jackets were being, and so they ended up easily two times as thick for a fifty-grain hollow level was. Ditto for that sixty four-grain Energy h4831 vs h4831sc Position, as these bullets are built for deer, not prairie canines or woodchucks. You now know anything I know about the 22-250 and sluggish-burning powders, and I do not know everything in the slightest degree with regards to the 223. I doubt that you're going to get wherever with that cartridge and h4831sc 4831, but allow us to know the way it goes.